Evidence · Accountability

Data Quality Policy

How WEDGE Africa collects, validates, and publishes programme data — and how we maintain the integrity of evidence on this portal.

Last updated: June 2026
Applies to: GROW Programme 2026 Pilot

Our commitment to data quality

WEDGE Africa is committed to publishing evidence that is accurate, timely, and honestly reflects what is happening in our programmes — including when results fall short of targets. We believe that credible evidence, even when unflattering, is more valuable than selectively presented success stories.

No data appears on this portal unless it has been reviewed, validated, and deliberately published by an authorised WEDGE Africa staff member.

This policy describes the standards we apply to data collected through the GROW Programme (2026 Pilot) and how that data flows from the field to this portal.

Data collection

Who collects data

All field data is collected by trained WEDGE Africa field officers (facilitators). Field officers do not have direct access to this portal. They submit data to the designated Data Officer or Programme Administrator through approved offline channels.

Collection methods

Data is collected using a combination of the following methods:

What data is collected

The GROW Programme collects data across the following areas: participant registration and baseline profiles, farm visit observations, training attendance, record book adoption, digital tool usage, climate-smart practice adoption, post-harvest loss estimates, market transactions, and buyer relationships. Endline data is collected at programme close to measure change over time.

Validation process

Step 1 — Field officer review

Field officers are responsible for completing data collection forms accurately and in full at the time of each interaction. Incomplete forms are returned for completion before submission.

Step 2 — Admin review

The WEDGE Africa Data Officer reviews all submitted data before entry into the system. This review checks for completeness, internal consistency, and plausibility of values. Queries are raised with field officers where data appears inconsistent.

Step 3 — Entry and cross-checking

Validated data is entered into the portal's admin system. The system flags missing fields and supports cross-checking of participant records against the registered cohort.

Step 4 — Publication approval

KPI figures are only published to dashboards when explicitly approved by the Programme Administrator or authorised staff. This is a deliberate manual step — there is no automatic publishing of raw data to any stakeholder view.

Publishing to dashboards

All stakeholder dashboards — including donor, board, and executive views — read exclusively from a published data layer. This means:

Data quality scores

WEDGE Africa maintains an internal data quality score that measures two dimensions:

The combined quality score is visible to internal staff (exec level and above) on the Evidence Quality dashboard. WEDGE Africa's target is to maintain a data quality score of 85% or above throughout the programme.

Known limitations

We are transparent about the limitations of our data:

These limitations are acknowledged in all formal reports issued by WEDGE Africa and should be considered when interpreting dashboard data.

Questions about data quality

If you have questions about how specific data on this portal was collected or validated, please contact WEDGE Africa at wedgeafrica.org. Formal data requests should be submitted through the Report Requests section of the dashboard.